Palace Hotel

From Ballarat and District Industrial Heritage Project
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (History: typo)
 
Line 58: Line 58:
 
----
 
----
  
[[Category:Hotels in Ballarat]]
 
 
[[Category:Mair Street]]
 
[[Category:Mair Street]]
 
[[Category:Lydiard Street]]
 
[[Category:Lydiard Street]]

Latest revision as of 02:39, 26 May 2019

There was also a Gin Palace.

The Palace Hotel was a hotel in Ballarat, Victoria, <1917-1918.

Contents

Background

The large hotel, of 40 rooms, was built by Hugh Raverty.[1]


The hotel was closed in 1918, when the license was surrendered.[1]

Site

The Palace Hotel was on the corner of Mair Street and Lydiard Street.[1]

History

In November 1917, the publican was charged with having traded liquor after hours, and allowing people to be on the premises after hours:

PALACE HOTEL CASE. Helen Raverty, licensee of the Ballarat Palace hotel. was charged with having permitted persons to be on licensed premises during prohibited hours on 4th November. She was also charged with having allowed traffic in liquor to take place. The defendant who did hot appear was represented by Mr J. B. Pearson. Two men were also charged with having been on licensed premises after trading hours. Both defendants pleaded not guilty. Constable Daniels stated that at 1.10a.m. on 4th November he visited the Palace hotel in company with Constable Fulton. He asked Miss Raverty what the men were doing on the premises, and she said, "They are staying for the night." When asked if the names of the men were on the book, Miss Raverty replied, "Yes." He examined the bar, and near the side where the two men were sitting were two bottles of gin. One was empty, and the other contained a little gin. Constable Fulton corroborated the evidence of the previous witness. Alice Raverty was called, but did not appear. Sub-lnspector Nicholson stated that Miss Raverty had been subpoenaed to attend and given conduct money. Miss Raverty was fined £1 and 1/ costs for non-attendance as a witness. One of the men found on the premises stated that he was a frequent lodger at the hotel. The other man deposed that he stayed at the hotel because his wife was away. The Police Magistrate (Mr Harris) said that the question to decide was whether the statements of the men were unreasonable. The men had reasonable grounds for being on the premises, and their evidence was uncontradicted. The police had a most difficult duty to carry out, but they were perfectly justified in bringing the cases before the court. Men who were found on licensed premises had to satisfy the court, and not the police, that they were there for a lawful purpose. The informations were dismissed.[2]

Community Involvement

The People

Legacies

See also

Notes


References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Index to Defunct Hotel Licences, Ballarat Palace, 08159-p0001-000001-116, Public Record Office of Victoria, http://www.access.prov.vic.gov.au/public/veo-download?objectId=090fe2738128bf58&format=pdf&docTitle=BallaratPalace&encodingId=Revision-2-Document-1-Encoding-1-DocumentData
  2. 1917 'PALACE HOTEL CASE.', The Ballarat Star (Vic. : 1865 - 1924), 21 November, p. 4. , viewed 04 Aug 2016, http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article154753962


Further Reading

External Links


Personal tools